skip navigation

LIBRARY

Abstract Database

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

To download this abstract, check the box next to the NCJ number then click the "Back To Search Results" link. Then, click the "Download" button on the Search Results page. Also see the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 91732 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Case for Alternatives to Detention
Journal: Juvenile and Family Court Journal  Volume:34  Issue:3  Dated:(August 1983)  Pages:37-45
Author(s): E Pabon
Date Published: 1983
Page Count: 9
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice/
Rockville, MD 20849
NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Many juveniles are unnecessarily held in secure detention prior to adjudication and could be released without endangering themselves or the community.
Abstract: Increased jailing of juveniles in secure facilities appears to be an emerging policy in the United States today. No written policies have been published concerning short-term lockups, but it exists as an unofficial correctional disposition. Secure detention is incarceration within a system traditionally hidden from public view and legislative scrutiny. Research has shown that secure detention is often used to punish the alleged offenders, for the administrative convenience of the court, and for lack of available social services for youths and their families. Alternatives to secure detention are less expensive and more appropriate. They include attention homes, group homes housing between 5 and 12 juveniles plus one set of live-in house parents; runaway programs, offering another kind of group home; and private residential foster homes. Examples of the misuse of secure detention in New York State and New York City and the potential for alternatives in New York City are discussed. A total of 26 notes are supplied.
Index Term(s): Juvenile detention; New York
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=91732

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.