skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 249511 Find in a Library
Title: Addressing Quality and Quantity: The Role of DNA Repair and Whole Genome Amplification in Forensically Relevant Samples
Author(s): Bruce Budowle
Date Published: December 2015
Page Count: 86
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 2010-DN-BX-K227
Sale Source: US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
810 Seventh Street, NW
Washington, DC 20531
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Report (Grant Sponsored); Report (Study/Research); Research (Applied/Empirical)
Format: Document; Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study explored methods for damaging DNA in its native complexed form prior to the testing of the PreCR Repair Mix (New England BioLabs) in an attempt to repair damaged template DNA prior to its use in PCR.
Abstract: The generation of significantly damaged DNA samples was challenging, requiring extensive time and substantial effort. The conditions are described in this report so that other researchers may be assisted in producing sufficiently damaged DNA for repair studies. Repair efforts with the PreCR Repair Mix were performed on DNA from environmentally damaged bloodstains, human skeletal remains, and bleach-damaged whole blood. Although the Pre CR Repair protocol improved the performance of STR profiling of bleach-damaged DNA and, to a lesser extent, environmentally damaged DNA, the results were varied and unreliable. A modified PreCR protocol outperformed the manufacturer-recommended approach, but still produced inconsistent results and only nominal increases in allele peak heights. The report advises that PreCR should not be considered for DNA repairs due to its poor performance. As an alternative to repair, whole genome amplification (WGA) was pursued. The DOP-PCR method was selected for WGA because of initial primer design and greater efficacy for amplifying degraded samples. The original DOP-PCR primer was modified by removing the unnecessary restriction site and reducing the required bases on the 3 end of the primer. This allowed for an overall more robust amplification of shorter fragments from damaged samples, contemporary skeletal samples, and Civil-War-era bone compared with results obtained by standard DNA typing and the unmodified DOP-PCR method. The new DOP-PCR primers show promise for WGA of degraded DNA. 29 tables, 23 figures, 60 references, and listings of products disseminated and researchers and collaborators
Main Term(s): Forensic sciences
Index Term(s): Degraded DNA Samples; DNA Typing; Investigative techniques; NIJ final report; NIJ grant-related documents; NIJ Resources; Suspect identification; Victim identification
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.